Statement of the Case: Engineer A, a recent university graduate, moved to a small town after
obtaining the P.Eng. designation and was hired by Engineer B, who had a small civil engineering
consulting firm. The firm included a technician and a secretary. Within a few months of arriving,
Engineer A was elected to the executive of the local chapter of the Association. There were
several towns in the chapter territory, and the evening meetings were in different towns
throughout the year. To get to the more-distant meetings on time, Engineer A had to leave work
early to allow travel time.
Engineer A asked Engineer B for permission to leave work an hour
early, but offered to make up the time by working late on other days. Leaving early would occur
about twice per month (including executive meetings) but would not be a major disruption, so
Engineer B agreed. Engineer B rarely attended the monthly chapter meetings.
After a year of employment with the firm, Engineer A expressed interest in taking a computer
software course at a nearby college. Although it was not a university-level course, it was directly
related to the work that Engineer A was performing. It would have required attendance on the
college campus, three hours per week, for 10 weeks. Engineer A asked for permission to attend
the course, offering to work late on other days to make up the lost time. Engineer B refused the
permission, saying that the work schedule was already disrupted when Engineer A left early to
attend the chapter meetings. Engineer A decided not to take the course.
Question: Does the employer have an obligation to assist Engineer A in his professional
activities?
Outcome: A few months later, Engineer Engineer A resigned and moved to another engineering firm in
the same town. No explanation was given for leaving the firm, but the reasons, as confided to a
few of the other members on the Chapter executive, shortly after the resignation, were as
follows:
“I found it surprising that my boss did not attend meetings of the local Chapter, and I was
even more surprised that he wouldn’t let me re-arrange my time to take a college course
which was intended to make me a better employee. I felt that he just didn’t want me to
improve my skills, so that I would be attractive to other employers. I realized that I didn’t
want to work for a boss with such a poor professional attitude. My new job pays me precisely
what I earned with Engineer B, but my new boss is far more professional, encourages
employees to participate in Association activities, up-grading education and engineering
societies, and even allows a reasonable amount of time off with pay.”
Authors’ Comments: Engineers and geoscientists should encourage other professionals,
technologists, and technicians to participate in continuing education to improve relevant
engineering, geoscience, and management skills. In fact, most Codes of Ethics specifically state
that practitioners should provide opportunities for the professional development of their
associates and subordinates. Employers should permit reasonable time off with pay, for
professional purposes. However, what is “reasonable” depends on circumstances. Such time is
rarely billable to clients or projects, so organizations may understandably insist that the
professional make up the time by working late on other days.
Question
ReplyDeleteDoes employer have obligation?
✅ Correct Answer
Yes — should reasonably support professional development
Q.Employer refuses reasonable training.
ReplyDeleteA. Acceptable
B. Employer should support development
C. No obligation
D. Employee fault
✅ Answer: B